Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   GZ 250 Forums > GZ250-Specific > Instructional Articles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2015, 08:39 PM   #281
Suzuki-san
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
got er dun - 16T

I bought the 16T JT Sprocket a while back, but finally got the nerve to do the swap. I'm glad I did, because the 30mm nut holding the 15T on was LOOSE! Thank goodness the bent washer was in place to keep it from unraveling!

Anyhoo, after studying the videos and reading this thread, and going over in my mind what I had to do, it was actually a pretty simple mod to do!

My experiences after the sprocket change to 16T is similar to other posters in this thread. I like that 1st gear is usable. The gears are spread out more, and it seems to run smoother. To me, the acceleration is as good if not better than before from start to 50+mph. I saw little or no loss in torque, esp. considering I am overweight by 100lbs or so. (curse you Krispy Kreme bacon donut dog... CURSE YOU!)

And as some of you have mentioned, and I am experiencing it as well, 5th gear is almost useless. At best it can hold a speed like 60mph. Try to accelerate, and it bogs down and goes slower. I guess it is too much for that engine to take the bike, my heavy self, a headwind plus doing 60mph, to do much more. The rest of the bike is stock. May consider rejetting the carb at a later date to compensate.

OVERALL I still like the mod. It is cheap to do and easily reversed if not satisfied.



Login or Register to Remove Ads
Suzuki-san is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2015, 08:59 PM   #282
raul10141964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 369
I recommend to mode the carburetor and air cleaner.
I wait 230 lb and hold 70 mi or more with no problems
I running a 140 main jet and mod factory air cleaner see the pic
The mode filter do not work with factory main jet
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20120830_110644.jpg (88.3 KB, 13 views)
raul10141964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 12:20 PM   #283
PG tips
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzuki-san View Post
I bought the 16T JT Sprocket a while back, but finally got the nerve to do the swap. I'm glad I did, because the 30mm nut holding the 15T on was LOOSE! Thank goodness the bent washer was in place to keep it from unraveling!

Anyhoo, after studying the videos and reading this thread, and going over in my mind what I had to do, it was actually a pretty simple mod to do!

My experiences after the sprocket change to 16T is similar to other posters in this thread. I like that 1st gear is usable. The gears are spread out more, and it seems to run smoother. To me, the acceleration is as good if not better than before from start to 50+mph. I saw little or no loss in torque, esp. considering I am overweight by 100lbs or so. (curse you Krispy Kreme bacon donut dog... CURSE YOU!)

And as some of you have mentioned, and I am experiencing it as well, 5th gear is almost useless. At best it can hold a speed like 60mph. Try to accelerate, and it bogs down and goes slower. I guess it is too much for that engine to take the bike, my heavy self, a headwind plus doing 60mph, to do much more. The rest of the bike is stock. May consider rejetting the carb at a later date to compensate.

OVERALL I still like the mod. It is cheap to do and easily reversed if not satisfied.
I went looking for a JT 16T replacement sprocket online, I found different thickness 16T sprockets available, what thickness suits the GZ with stock chain? or does anyone have a part number?

Id toyed with the idea of getting a larger engined replacement bike, but for a few reasons that idea has fizzled out. Really the most cost effective thing for me to is just to try some of the simple mods on the GZ to try improve its characteristics which suit me well enough for what and how I use it already.
It'd be a shame not to try it really, and the idea of not having to change up a gear almost immediately sounds good. Dont know if a carb mod is needed or is better to do if changing the sprocket, which Ive read is recommended on another older thread



Login or Register to Remove Ads

Last edited by jonathan180iq; 04-16-2015 at 04:00 PM.
PG tips is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 01:01 PM   #284
raul10141964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 369
mod the carb and filter gibe you 1 to 2 HP more and make the engine rune colder
raul10141964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 03:05 PM   #285
PG tips
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 67
I might try that too, but its not extra HP Im after in particular (is it a noticeable difference though?)
Making first useful and the prospect of the engine not reving as high as it seems to, is more what Im after, this seems to be described as the effect of changing the sprocket from a 15t to a 16t.



Login or Register to Remove Ads
PG tips is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 03:19 PM   #286
raul10141964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 369
The extra hp Wil be noticeable on fifth giar
raul10141964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 04:02 PM   #287
jonathan180iq
Super Moderator
 
jonathan180iq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 3,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by PG tips View Post
I might try that too, but its not extra HP Im after in particular (is it a noticeable difference though?)
Making first useful and the prospect of the engine not reving as high as it seems to, is more what Im after, this seems to be described as the effect of changing the sprocket from a 15t to a 16t.
Definitely. Lowering engine cruising speeds was my original intent and for that there is not an easier mod.

Also, as Raul said, up-jetting to a richer fuel mixture will help keep exhaust gasses a bit cooler and possibly help in engine longevity.
jonathan180iq is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 05:46 PM   #288
PG tips
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 67
Do either of these mods affect fuel economy? for good or bad
PG tips is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 05:48 PM   #289
raul10141964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 369
60 mph
raul10141964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 07:31 PM   #290
Water Warrior 2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by PG tips View Post
Do either of these mods affect fuel economy? for good or bad
Shouldn't be enough difference to sweat over at the pumps. A rider's right hand has a lot to do with economy.
Water Warrior 2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.