Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   GZ 250 Forums > General Motorcycle-Related > Other Models/Manufacturers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2010, 03:49 AM   #11
Water Warrior 2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

All bikes suddenly got heavier due to advertised wet weight rather than dry weight. My Vstrom picked up an extra 45 pounds overnight.
As for looking for another more powerful but light bike you may want to determine what kind of riding you are looking for. This will give us some info to work with but I have to agree with a wait and see attitude. You may change your riding needs in a year and be looking for something entirely different. Just ride the GZ for what it is and appreciate it's capabilities and not it's liabilities. The longer you ride it the more it will teach you and increase your skill level for the next bike.



Login or Register to Remove Ads
Water Warrior 2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 05:27 AM   #12
alantf
Senior Member
 
alantf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tenerife (Spain)
Posts: 3,715
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viirin

I haven't even seen a vulcan 500 here in Ireland but if it's half the bike the guys on here make it out to be i'd say it's a solid bet as an upgrade.

Vii
Kawasaki stopped making the European version in 2008, so the only ones you'll see are second hand.
__________________
By birth an Englishman, by the grace of God a Yorkshireman.
alantf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 08:38 AM   #13
dhgeyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Merrimack NH USA
Posts: 722
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viirin
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhgeyer
It makes 25 hp compared to the GZ's 16.
A bit off topic but has the GZ only got 16hp? thought it was ~20hp.
Vii
My bad. Motorcycle Consumer News measures HP at the rear wheel, and it was 17, not 16 as I had remembered. The 25 HP figure was from Hyosung's website, so that would be measured at the engine. Measured at the rear wheel, it would be somewhat lower, maybe 22 or so. So the difference in HP isn't that much. However, there must be something different about them (gearing?), because the Hyosung is highway competent, whereas the GZ is not.

The Vulcan 500 is still a better bike for the highway, and I don't think anyone should have trouble riding it if they've had a year or so on a GZ.
__________________
54 HD Hummer,64 Honda150,66 Ducati250,01 Vulcan500,02 Vulcan1500,83 Nighthawk650,91 K75,95 VLX,04 VLX,01 GS500E,01 Ninja250, 02 Rebel,04 Ninja500,06 Concours,96 R850R



Login or Register to Remove Ads
dhgeyer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 08:53 AM   #14
mrlmd1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crawfordville, Florida
Posts: 2,853
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

The experience with the Vulcan may or may not be an exception, but light weight and highway riding may not always be compatible. Some light bikes tend to get blown all over the road from wind, passing cars and trucks, presence or absence of a windshield, etc. Before you buy one, get it out on the road for an extended ride.
mrlmd1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 09:53 AM   #15
Pete7874
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 65
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Seems like the Vulcan may be what I want after all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrlmd1
Before you buy one, get it out on the road for an extended ride.
The problem is that nobody around here will actually let you test drive a bike like that... dealers won't let you ride it at all, and private sellers will typically only let you do a small round around their house/neighborhood. At least that was my experience, and I did have a motorcycle license.
__________________



Login or Register to Remove Ads
Pete7874 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 01:14 PM   #16
Easy Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7874
dealers won't let you ride it at all,
There are ways......even in Chicago.

Given the price of the bike to hold as a "deposit".....in cash.....almost any dealer will change their mind about a test ride on a used bike.....providing that you can handle it in the parking lot before going out.

Riding IN on a bike helps too. Having proof of insurance in hand does too.
There are, of course, exceptions. If you are a 16 year old kid or a 90 lb. gir, l a test ride on a "big" bike probably won't happen anywhere........and it probably shouldn't either.
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights!
Easy Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 12:10 AM   #17
Pete7874
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 65
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

What about Suzuki S50? Seems to have similar weight and seat height as the Vulcan...
__________________
Pete7874 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 11:03 AM   #18
Easy Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7874
What about Suzuki S50? Seems to have similar weight and seat height as the Vulcan...
Another good choice; more of a standard than a cruiser.
It LOOKS like the seat height is higher, like the S-40, but I've never been on either.
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights!
Easy Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 12:05 PM   #19
Pete7874
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 65
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
It LOOKS like the seat height is higher, like the S-40, but I've never been on either.
Yeah, it's just the looks I guess. According to specs, the S50 and the Vulcan 500 have very similar seat height:

S50: 27.6
Vulcan 500: 28.1
GZ250: 26.8

One bad thing about the S50 is a kind of smallish fuel tank: 3.17 gal.

Also, I see the S50 has a shaft drive as opposed to chain in the Vulcan 500. Is one better than the other? Less maintenance with a shaft drive, but is it reliable?
__________________
Pete7874 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 01:07 PM   #20
Easy Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7874
Yeah, it's just the looks I guess. According to specs, the S50 and the Vulcan 500 have very similar seat height:
Bare numbers can sometimes be deceiving; seat width and shape and even peg placement can sometimes affect your ability to flat-foot. You really have to do a "test sit".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7874
Less maintenance with a shaft drive, but is it reliable?
Yes and yes. I much prefer a shaft......but everything else would have to be an absolute dead even tie before the shaft would sway me to one bike over another.
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights!
Easy Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.