![]() |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Quote:
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Quote:
And furthermore I wasn't criticizing the GZ merely my opinion on whether the manufacturer has taken the time to make things perfect, but perfection is only perfect in the eyes of the original designer. The concept of a GZ being based on a Low budget market for people in third world countries make it that much easier for a non third world country to customize and just possibly improve on. |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Big A+ for attitude. Keep tinkering, I want to see what you come up with in the future.
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Gearing is all about "compramise" it doesn't matter weather you have an 1100 cc bike with 120 hp, or a 250cc with 18 hp. Here's a few basic points for those who are curious. As you gear "lower" ie swapping from a 16T countershaft sprocket to a 15T you will gain acceleration as the engine is now allowed to rev quicker, and less engine torque is required to get the bike moving. Your peak rpm's are also matched to a LESSER top speed vs stock. When you gear higher (swapping from a 16T to a 17T ) you "in theory" should gain top speed.
The issue is with "theoretical" is that the gearing caculators that are available on the internet do not factor "real world" variables such as "rolling resistance" and "added mass". These two major factors play a large role in negating the presumed effects of gearing higher for increased top speeds. Basically if your engine doesnt have adequate hp that's required to pull higher than stock gearing, you most likely LOOSE top speed, as now the engine cant reach peak rpm's. Now if you take everything iv'e said and reverse the facts this is how gear changes effect REAR sprocket changes, so swapping a 38T to a 37T rear sprocket is actually reversed, and you are now gearing higher. I'm sure that The GZ is geared for a "compromise" of both power and top speed from the factory, you can always gear lower as you are now freeing up required hp, but i doubt if there is much extra hp available for gained top speeds given the purpose and cc limitations of the GZ. I just picked up a sweet '01 GZ250 for my wife, and I spent the whole weekend going through the bike, and I am impressed, what a fantastic 1st bike for a person ! I obviously have not spent enough time with our new to us GZ to make a call on a gearing change, i just wanted to share some good gearing knowledge.. Rich |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
The GZ is a good bike. It will take a lot of abuse and keep on ticking.
I put over 15,000 mile on mine and the only problem I had was the fuel screen came off in the tank. this let a piece of trash get in the carb. I took the carb off cleaned it and keep on truckin!! :) :2tup: |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Road clam, just looked at your list of 2 wheelers. I would guess you have had fun with different gear ratios on various bikes and your real world experience will be an asset for all members here. Welcome to the forum.
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Quote:
I actually did a lot of gearing experimentation with my '82 GS1100E . The issue I had was too high rpm's for cruising at 80 mph on the highway caused a bad "bar buzz" at around 5100 rpm's . So I changed the gearing from 17/42 to 17/40 and it was just enough to bring down the highway cruising rpm's about 300 rpm's minimise the bar buzz. I also have done a ton of gearing swaps on my motocross bikes depending on the reqiured terrain. Thanks for the warm welcome ! |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
I just bought a 2000 GZ250 and have only put about 50 miles on it, so far I like it for a good economical bike to save on gas, the only complaint I have is trying to maintain speed going up hill / against wind on the highway... I've read through quite a few posts on here and been playing around with gearingcommander.com but curious if I am interpreting the information I'm reading correctly...
From what I've read the GZ250 is redline at 8000 rpm, peak torque is (14.0 lbs ft) at 7000 rpm, so I'm assuming the reason I'm losing speed while climbing hills or against wind on the highway is because I'm riding wide open throttle to hit 75 on the highway which would put me close to redline (gearingcommander says 75 with stock sprockets would be 7539rpm, but I'm assuming I'm actually closer to redline because of my weight its taking more to get me to 75, assuming of course since it has no tach). I haven't tried downshifting on the highway, but I did on a backroad doing about 60 and it seemed to help hold my speed a little better... so I've been reading about sprocket changes and I'm wondering if I change from 15/41 to 16/41 it says that it would drop the RPM's at 75 down to 7068 which would put me pretty close to peak torque which should help me maintain 75 better against wind / going up hill wouldn't it? But from what I've been reading it seems like everyone is going after higher top speed, I'm more than happy with 75 on the highway and 60 on main roads as long as I can hold the speed against the wind / going up hill... it seems like I need to go to 16/41 and then being closer to peak torque should help me maintain the speed? |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Welcome to the forum.The 16t front sprocket is good for lowering the R.P.M's that make the lower gears more useable around town & flat roads.The bike does not have enough power (torque) to keep the revs up on hills unless you want to stay in 4th gear longer.
:) :cool: |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Quote:
The 16 tooth sprocket is very limited in where it will run. Flat ground and no wind. If you vary out of this zone you will be in 4th, but 4th will be almost as fast as the 15 in 5th. There is no real torque in top gear. |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
that may be the answer, if the 16T makes it a little better in 4th then I'd be OK running 60 in 4th without having it whine at me too much... I ran it in 4th going home last night and it seemed OK at 60 but just a little more whine than what I care for, but I didn't get to run it at 60 for very long because we had 25+ mph winds last night that I was going head on into headed home and I don't have proper riding gear yet so my coat was acting like a big sail and was getting thrown all over the place in the wind...
it will probably be a while before I modify it since this is the newest bike I've ever had and it is in almost mint condition, the previous owner took excellent care of it, so I won't mod anything on it until I get some ride time on it first =) |
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Yep,you are correct. :cool: :)
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
I'm actually finding that as I ride the bike more it seems to be giving me a little better top speed... not sure what the break in period should be? bike had 9730 on it when I bought it, I'm up to 9980 now and the bike is starting to come around to the way I want it to run... we'll see how she runs after I put some more miles on her and see if I really need to change sprockets or not...
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
If you want to crest the hills faster the surest method is to loose weight.
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
working on that =) I had dropped about 30 lbs 2 years back but I've slowly put it all back on over the past 2 years so I'm right back where I was... I have my own home gym now so now I have no excuse (other than that I'm lazy and tired between work and school so I get done with work/school and want to be lazy).
|
Re: Gears... 15/41 Stock v.s. 18/38 mod
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.